Delineation: Ogbe~Ijoh In Diaspora Writes Tinubu, Alleges Electoral Injustice, Warns Against Rising Ethnic Tensions
A coalition of concerned Ogbe-Ijoh citizens in the diaspora has made an urgent appeal to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, calling on him to intervene in the implementation of a Supreme Court ruling mandating a fresh delineation of electoral wards in Warri Federal Constituency, Delta State.
The appeal, addressed in a formal letter to the President, describes the current situation as a constitutional and democratic crisis threatening the fragile peace in the Warri region. At the heart of the issue is the Supreme Court’s 2022 judgment in Timinimi v. INEC, which ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to redraw ward boundaries in Warri South, Warri South West, and Warri North LGAs to reflect accurate population data, as mandated by Sections 71–75 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).
However, the diaspora group alleges that the judgment's implementation is being actively obstructed by elements within the Itsekiri ethnic group through misinformation campaigns, ethnic provocation, and even threats to national oil infrastructure.
The letter highlights deep-rooted grievances around what the Ogbe-Ijoh group describes as decades of electoral marginalization. It points to manipulated voter registers and lopsided ward allocations, particularly in Warri South West, where the minority Itsekiri reportedly enjoyed six wards to the Ijaw’s four—despite being outnumbered in population.
Read the full letter below:
His Excellency,
Bola Ahmed Tinubu, GCFR
President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria
Aso Rock Presidential Villa
Abuja, FCT, Nigeria
Your Excellency,
Urgent Appeal for the Implementation of the Supreme Court Judgment on Ward Delineation in Warri Federal Constituency
We, the undersigned, representing concerned Ogbe-Ijohs in the diaspora, write to you with profound respect and unwavering faith in your leadership to address a critical issue threatening the democratic integrity and peace of the Warri Federal Constituency in Delta State. For over a decade, we have closely observed the unfolding events surrounding the ward delineation in the three local government areas (LGAs) of Warri South, Warri South West, and Warri North, following the landmark Supreme Court judgment between Timinimi v. I.N.E.C. (2023) 7 NWLR (Pt. 1882) 109. This judgment mandated the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to conduct a fresh delineation of wards to reflect the true population distribution, as enshrined in Sections 71,72, 73 and 75 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (CFRN) 1999 (as amended).
Regrettably, the implementation of this judgment has been met with orchestrated resistance, misinformation, and diversionary tactics, particularly from certain segments of the Itsekiri ethnic group, who have sought to reframe the constitutional issue of ward delineation into a contentious debate over the ownership of Warri. We are compelled to set the record straight and appeal for your decisive intervention to ensure justice, equity, and adherence to the rule of law. By allowing INEC to execute its mandate impartially, your administration can resolve a long-standing grievance, foster peace, and etch a legacy of fairness in Nigeria’s democratic history.
Background and Context
The Warri Federal Constituency, comprising Warri South, Warri South West, and Warri North LGAs, is a diverse region inhabited by three major ethnic groups: the Ijaw, Urhobo, and Itsekiri. Historically, this area has been plagued by ethnic tensions, often exacerbated by electoral malpractices and inequitable resource allocation. A significant source of these conflicts has been the skewed delineation of electoral wards, which has disproportionately favored the Itsekiri, a minority group, over the Ijaw and Urhobo, who constitute the majority in terms of population.
Prior to the 2022 Supreme Court judgment, the ward delineation in these LGAs was based on a manipulated voter register that inflated electoral figures in Itsekiri-dominated areas. For instance, in Warri South West LGA, the Itsekiri were allocated six wards, while the Ijaw, despite their larger population, were assigned only four. This imbalance was compounded by a voter register that produced implausible election results. During the 2007, 2011, and 2015 general elections, Itsekiri areas reportedly recorded over 60% of the votes in Warri South West Local Government Area—a figure widely regarded as fraudulent. The introduction of the Biometric Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) in the 2023 elections exposed this manipulation, reducing reported votes in these areas by approximately 300%. The BVAS results in 2023 for Warri South West showed that the Itsekiris had around 3,000 votes, while the Ijaws had 8,000, reflecting a more accurate population count. Similar reductions were observed in Warri South and Warri North LGAs.
This manipulated register underpinned numerous elections, undermining the democratic rights of the Ijaw and Urhobo communities. Frustrated by these injustices, the Ijaw people initiated legal action in 2011 at the Federal High Court in Asaba, culminating in the Supreme Court’s 2022 directive for INEC to undertake a fresh delineation based on accurate population data. The court’s ruling was a triumph for constitutionalism, affirming Section 72 of the CFRN, which mandates that electoral constituencies reflect population size to ensure equitable representation.
The Current Agitation: Diversionary Tactics and Misinformation
Since the Supreme Court’s judgment, we have witnessed a concerted effort by some Itsekiri leaders and groups to obstruct INEC’s delineation exercise. Through a series of media publications, television appearances, and press conferences, these parties have shifted the narrative from ward delineation to the emotionally charged question of “who owns Warri.” This reframing is a deliberate strategy to divert attention from the constitutional mandate of population-based delineation and to perpetuate the status quo of electoral inequity.
Television anchors and media outlets have inadvertently amplified this narrative, posing questions about Warri’s ownership rather than focusing on the legal and demographic basis for ward delineation. Such discussions are a red herring, designed to inflame ethnic tensions and obscure the core issue. The ownership of Warri, while a sensitive historical and cultural matter, is irrelevant to the current task of ensuring wards reflect population realities. We are alarmed by the Itsekiri’s refusal to engage with population data, instead resorting to claims of territorial ownership or demands to retain the old, discredited voter register.
Moreover, reports indicate that some Itsekiri factions have resorted to threats, including disruptions of oil facilities, to pressure INEC and the federal government. These actions not only undermine democratic processes but also jeopardize Nigeria’s economic stability, given Warri’s strategic importance to the oil industry. We firmly believe this orchestrated campaign is intended to deceive the public and your administration, diverting focus from INEC’s constitutional duty.
The Constitutional Imperative: Sections 71,72,73 and 75 Population-Based Delineation At the heart of this issue is Section 72 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended), which provides:
“No Senatorial district or Federal constituency shall fall within more than one State, and the boundaries of each district or constituency shall be as contiguous as possible and be such that the number of inhabitants thereof is as nearly equal to the population quota as is reasonably practicable.”
The operative word here is population. Wards and constituencies must reflect the demographic realities of their respective areas to ensure fair representation. The Supreme Court’s judgment in Timinimi v. I.N.E.C reaffirmed this principle, ordering INEC to correct the historical imbalances in Warri’s ward structure.
Historically, the Itsekiri’s disproportionate ward allocation in Warri South West, Warri South, and Warri North LGAs has distorted electoral outcomes, disenfranchising the Ijaw and Urhobo majorities. This imbalance contributed to violent ethnic clashes in 1996 and 2000, which claimed numerous lives and destabilized the region. The Supreme Court’s ruling offers a pathway to peace by addressing this root cause, provided INEC is allowed to act without interference.
INEC’s Recent Efforts: A Step Toward Justice
We commend INEC’s recent efforts to implement the Supreme Court’s judgment through fieldwork conducted between January and March 2025. Unlike previous delineations, which were often manipulated in office settings, INEC’s current approach involves on-the-ground assessments to verify population distributions. Preliminary reports from INEC’s fieldwork, published in April 2025, propose a revised ward structure that aligns with demographic realities, increasing wards in Ijaw and Urhobo areas while adjusting those in Itsekiri communities to reflect their minority status.
This evidence-based approach marks a significant departure from past practices and demonstrates INEC’s commitment to constitutional compliance. However, the Itsekiri’s response—characterized by protests, threats, and media campaigns—has sought to undermine these efforts. Their insistence on using the discredited voter register or framing the issue as one of ownership, rather than population, is a calculated attempt to obstruct justice.
The Stakes for Your Administration
Your Excellency, the successful implementation of this Supreme Court judgment presents a historic opportunity to address a long-standing injustice and promote peace in the three Warri LGAs. Previous administrations have faltered in upholding justice, allowing electoral malpractices to persist. Your leadership, renowned for its courage and commitment to national unity, is uniquely positioned to break this cycle.
By supporting INEC’s delineation exercise, your administration can:
Uphold the Rule of Law: Reinforce Nigeria’s commitment to constitutionalism and judicial independence, as mandated by the Supreme Court.
Promote Peace: Address a root cause of ethnic conflict in Warri, fostering reconciliation among the Ijaw, Urhobo, and Itsekiri.
Enhance Democracy: Ensure equitable representation, strengthening trust in Nigeria’s electoral processes.
Failure to act, however, risks perpetuating electoral inequity, reigniting ethnic tensions, and undermining public confidence in your government. The Itsekiri’s tactics, if unchecked, could embolden other groups to challenge judicial and constitutional mandates, setting a dangerous precedent.
Our Appeal
We humbly appeal to Your Excellency to take decisive action to support INEC’s implementation of the Supreme Court’s judgment. Specifically, we urge you to:
Direct INEC to Proceed Unhindered: Ensure INEC completes the delineation process based on its 2025 fieldwork, free from external pressures or threats.
Reject Diversionary Narratives: Disregard claims of Warri’s ownership as irrelevant to the constitutional issue of population-based ward delineation.
Support INEC’s ongoing delineation exercise in the Warri Federal Constituency in line with the Supreme Court’s judgment and Section 72 of the 1999 Constitution.
Resist diversionary rhetoric aimed at turning a democratic exercise into an ethnic conflict.
Uphold the independence of INEC, ensuring that the Commission completes its constitutional duty without fear, interference, or intimidation.
Document and record this reform as one of the transformations.
By taking these steps, you will not only resolve a decades-long grievance but also cement your legacy as a leader who championed justice and unity. The history of Nigeria is replete with missed opportunities to address ethnic and electoral injustices; let your administration be remembered as the one that rose above such challenges.
Conclusion
Your Excellency, the ward delineation crisis in Warri Federal Constituency is a test of Nigeria’s democratic resilience and your administration’s resolve. The Supreme Court’s judgment of July 22, 2022, offers a clear path to rectify historical wrongs, but its implementation is being threatened by diversionary tactics and ethnic posturing. We, as concerned Ogbe-Ijohs in the diaspora, stand with you in seeking a just and lasting solution. By allowing INEC to fulfill its constitutional mandate, you can write your name in gold in the annals of our nation’s history, ensuring that the voices of the Ijaw, Urhobo, and all Nigerians are heard through fair representation.
We trust in your wisdom and courage to act decisively, and we pledge our support for your efforts to build a stronger, more equitable Nigeria.
Yours sincerely,
6/18/2025, 12:01:32 PM
views 17558
8485